Transport investment has been widening the inequality gap. Is it time for a fresh approach to deliver fairer and more efficient transport systems?
Improving mobility for people has been a key goal in transport policy for as long as transport policy has become part of the political discourse. These mobility based policies have failed even in their own terms. Policies to promote green transport modes and to curb car use have not resulted in cleaner, more efficient and fairer transport systems. Car dependency continues to grow and those with the poorest mobility find themselves increasingly isolated by a society that no longer serves the needs of people who rely on local access to services and who need better access to opportunity to participate fully in society.
Is it time to filter the government stake in transport invest through the scrutiny of audits of access to opportunity? Under current transport investment programmes, the most mobile are usually the greatest beneficiaries. It is not the role of government to widen the mobility gap in society. If audits of access to opportunity show that investment does not deliver equitable access to opportunity it should not proceed. Audits of access to opportunity could shift the focus of Scottish Government transport investment towards smart places and cities which focus on the needs of people and the needs of places. Instead of spending the bulk of transport funding on roads and railways the projects would change to invest in streets for people and connections that support economic activity.
What do you think? Is it time to drop mobility goals from transport policy and start measuring changes in access rather then changes in travel demand as the primary measure of success?